Jump to content

EPISODE 68 — Why Documentaries Lie

3 replies to this topic

#1 July Diaz

    Earwolf Buddy

  • Administrators
  • 5,868 posts
  • LocationUnder a roof

Posted 29 March 2015 - 11:19 PM

Anthropomorphic goatee and director of 'The Jinx' Andrew Jarecki has recently taken criticism from many sides regarding the ending of his documentary series. Some condemn the way he sat on critical evidence and withheld it from the police, while others criticize how he inserts himself into the story of 'The Jinx' and how its final episode fraudulently plays with chronology. But if Robert Durst goes to prison, do the ends justify the means?

Other popular documentaries have an even less legitimate relationship with the truth. Morgan Spurlock's results from 'Super Size Me' haven't been able to be replicated; 'Searching for Sugarman' conveniently leaves out that Rodriguez knew he was world famous in a number of other countries; and 'Fahrenheit 9/11' is basically pure propaganda, yet their entertainment value is undeniable and carries weight despite these criticisms.

This week on the podcast, Jack O'Brien is joined by editors Jason Pargin (aka David Wong) and Josh Sargent to talk about the recent documentary boom and some of the genre's most popular entries from the last 10 years. They have a spoiler-filled discussion about 'Serial' and 'The Jinx', talk through the tricks documentarians use to manipulate truth, and whether their ultimate obligation should be to honesty or entertainment.
listen to carmen christopher on the latest ep of my podcast trends with benefits twb.cool

#2 jackstar7

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 81 posts

Posted 30 March 2015 - 10:44 AM

Get yourselves the Criteron 'Qatsi trilogy.

And pick up Baraka and the other Ron Fricke films.

Fun stuff.

#3 tonanamous


  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 30 March 2015 - 01:32 PM

The account of the lampshade made from tattooed human skin was not proven in court (with no physical evidence present), however there are many accounts of thier existence, particularly in the home of the Commendant of Buchenwald, whose wife would pick the tattoos she would want preserved. In this first-hand account, he mentions that they disappeared shortly after being discovered.


I have read other official reports from the liberation of different camps which cited very similar tattoo/skin objects. I don't think it's a stretch to believe those things existed.

#4 ragnar


  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • LocationPhiladelphia

Posted 30 March 2015 - 09:49 PM

....the main thing I'm left wondering after listening to this episode is: did Jason Pargin/"David Wong" actually "vote for Bush twice", or was that entirely a joke??