dave anthony

@Dirk You are everything that is wrong with forums and, specifically, this forum. I would have banned you ages ago if I was in charge. People on other forums describe you as a horrible troll here. They are right. Your comments toward Scott, Jeff, myself, and both Matts was over the line. With that in mind, you do not deserve a response from myself.

@Dirk You are everything that is wrong with forums and, specifically, this forum. I would have banned you ages ago if I was in charge. People on other forums describe you as a horrible troll here. They are right. Your comments toward Scott, Jeff, myself, and both Matts was over the line. With that in mind, you do not deserve a response from myself.

Well, you guys are fun! First off, I want to clear something up. I was on a comedy podcast, whether I was judging, hosting or part of the contest, that means I'm going to try to say funny things. Calling a submission "bullshit" and immediately following it up with "...that is what we are supposed to say here, right?" is a joke and it's my sense of humor. A lot of you guys don't know me but I don't plan on changing my humor because audience members don't know me. .......... Second, I voted based on laughs per minute and nothing else. I'm sorry many of you feel TL was less funny than LHR. I disagree. My opinion was only based on the five minutes I heard. I did NOT take into account my belief that LHR should have brought up Zach dropping out. That's my own personal opinion and I still believe it to be true but I voted based simply on who made me laugh in the end. Some of you refuse to believe TL could have been funnier than LHR. You're wrong. It was. .......... Third, a lot has been made about the instructions to the judges. Some things may have been left out but I am responsible for not hearing the submissions could be "under" five minutes and that the material could be anything. I was told but didn't listen. That's how I work. Maybe it would be better to write it down for the judges because some of us are dumbs. ......... Fourth, I think Scott and Jeff are doing something interesting here. They just created a podcast that is unlike any podcast in the world. I've never heard of a podcast contest like this and, in my opinion, it's good. And guess what? When people are figuring things out there are going to be bumps and stumbles. Mistakes are going to be made and there will be learning moments. I find the way some of you are treating guys who are trying to create a broad schedule of podcasts to be pretty disgusting. There is no conspiracy. There is no bias for or against. Sometimes things we like get kicked in the ass. That's life. Some of you need to take a step back and think about some things because life is full of injustices but most importantly, COMEDY IS SUBJECTIVE. .......... Fifth, and most importantly, your attacks here will make judges hesitant to be honest on any future Earwolf Challenges. "Hey, when you go do the Earwolf Challenge, be super nice to all the podcasts, no matter what you think because the listeners who disagree with you will go leave bad reviews on iTunes and attack you endlessly on the forum." Brilliant fucking move, guys. And, yes, more than one comedian has asked me about it today. You guys can scream all you want about how this wasn't done right but that can all be fixed next time around. Your actions cannot.

Well, you guys are fun! First off, I want to clear something up. I was on a comedy podcast, whether I was judging, hosting or part of the contest, that means I'm going to try to say funny things. Calling a submission "bullshit" and immediately following it up with "...that is what we are supposed to say here, right?" is a joke and it's my sense of humor. A lot of you guys don't know me but I don't plan on changing my humor because audience members don't know me. .......... Second, I voted based on laughs per minute and nothing else. I'm sorry many of you feel TL was less funny than LHR. I disagree. My opinion was only based on the five minutes I heard. I did NOT take into account my belief that LHR should have brought up Zach dropping out. That's my own personal opinion and I still believe it to be true but I voted based simply on who made me laugh in the end. Some of you refuse to believe TL could have been funnier than LHR. You're wrong. It was. .......... Third, a lot has been made about the instructions to the judges. Some things may have been left out but I am responsible for not hearing the submissions could be "under" five minutes and that the material could be anything. I was told but didn't listen. That's how I work. Maybe it would be better to write it down for the judges because some of us are dumbs. ......... Fourth, I think Scott and Jeff are doing something interesting here. They just created a podcast that is unlike any podcast in the world. I've never heard of a podcast contest like this and, in my opinion, it's good. And guess what? When people are figuring things out there are going to be bumps and stumbles. Mistakes are going to be made and there will be learning moments. I find the way some of you are treating guys who are trying to create a broad schedule of podcasts to be pretty disgusting. There is no conspiracy. There is no bias for or against. Sometimes things we like get kicked in the ass. That's life. Some of you need to take a step back and think about some things because life is full of injustices but most importantly, COMEDY IS SUBJECTIVE. .......... Fifth, and most importantly, your attacks here will make judges hesitant to be honest on any future Earwolf Challenges. "Hey, when you go do the Earwolf Challenge, be super nice to all the podcasts, no matter what you think because the listeners who disagree with you will go leave bad reviews on iTunes and attack you endlessly on the forum." Brilliant fucking move, guys. And, yes, more than one comedian has asked me about it today. You guys can scream all you want about how this wasn't done right but that can all be fixed next time around. Your actions cannot.