There's a point in this episode where the quick thinking of a woman is said to have, "probably saved her life." The man they're talking about certainly should've been pursued as a suspect, but to imply that he was "probably" a murderer is a ridiculous stretch that doesn't belong in a journalistic podcast.
I also dislike the narrator's tendency to insert herself into the narrative. At one point she interrupts an interview to say, paraphrasing, "I put myself in her shoes and wonder what I would've thought." Who cares?
I like the podcast, to be clear, these things just stand out because the subject is so important and the rest of the podcast is done so well.
