Episode 95: STAR TREK II: THE WRATH OF KHAN

[Episode 95: STAR TREK II: THE WRATH OF KHAN]

nope - no way. it's too stilted and simple -and the ending feels unearned within the scope of the film itself.

[Episode #91: LABYRINTH]

i can't vote this one in - it's just not a terribly good story - interesting performances, sure, interesting themes, definitely? but the story itself is a bit muddled and generic.

[Episode 75: BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN]

yes, duh

[Episode 74: PATHER PANCHALI]

I vote no.

Pather Panchali's boring. There's not even any songs in it.

 

doesn't it make more sense to criticize a film for what it is, than what it isn't? i get 'boring' -that's fine- but it's not a musical, so your disappointment ultimately lies with your personal expectations, not anything the film fails to deliver on.

[Episode 74: PATHER PANCHALI]

yes, definitely in the canon. the whole trilogy.

 

also, 'historocity' isn't a word. it's 'historicity'.

[Episode 68 - Antichrist (w/ Michael Lerman)]

YES. Antichrist is a cinematic masterwork, and a truly strong, feminist statement. In a hundred years, I believe it will be one of the handful of films from this period in time that has any cultural relevance.