KLK 12 Posted June 4, 2017 I'm a sucker for great child based sport movies. The 90's were the era in which there were a glut of of them. Most of the films were baseball centric and were great. Some were better than others, but non the less great ( The Sandlot, Rookie of the Year, Little Big League, Angels in the Outfield). Disney (who produced Angels in the Outfield) clearly felt they had to keep riding this wave and go a step further with the sport children's film sub genre by adding time travel to the mix. What you end up getting with a A Kid in King Arthur's Court is a mish mash of film elements from both Medieval/sports movies which should never be mixed. This film contains beyond ridiculous dialogue, cheesy acting and lousy narrative. I saw this in the theaters at 9 and even then I knew it was bad and felt like my mother needed to get her money back. Â Wild fact- This film was the first if not one of the first big screen, big budget films for Daniel Craig and Kate Winslet (Kate friggin Winslet) Â Trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t0wnZBkDbE Share this post Link to post
KLK 12 Posted June 4, 2017 Some Rotten Tomatoes reviews and a link to a film review if you want a sense of how bad this was. I find the reviewer annoying, but he does point out things that make the film truly cheesy and bad. Â https://www.rottento..._arthurs_court/ Â Film review (Spoilers Contained) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGtkUaKIkp8 Share this post Link to post
KLK 12 Posted June 13, 2017 Here is a recent article about this movie in light of the recent "King Arthur" bomb. http://io9.gizmodo.com/a-kid-in-king-arthurs-court-is-the-dumbest-arthurian-le-1795146473 Share this post Link to post