JosephGreen

Maybe a versus of Blood Feast versus 2000 Maniacs, or maybe just a single one. I know they're not GOOD movies, but one of them belongs in the canon I believe; A) he did gore in a way that no one ever had before, and sort of broke ground for future, grimier movies, B ) I think it would be interesting to discuss whether a movie that is so clearly exploitation can be in the canon. Both these movies really force the question: are movies works of art, or are they commercial products? Also I'm pretty sure both of these are watchable on youtube.

Love love love this movie, and also think it's one of the most important early action/drama/comedy/blockbusters. that's why it belongs in the canon -- I want it in there because it's so great.

I gotta say, I'm picking this one because if it was the end of the world, and all I had was Canon movies, I would want this one to be there. I think that's how I'm gonna think about it from now on.

I feel very, extremely passionate about this movie. It's really the one that got me interested more in film in general, and I have a very emotional connection with it. I can also see where Devin is coming from, but I really gotta side with Amy on this one. I just think that Devin was too detached, whereas Amy took the time to and effort to listen and feel what the movie was saying.

I would agree that Texas Chainsaw should replace Pyscho. Do they look at these suggestions? I also think that Psycho could either be its own, or maybe have it face off against Peeping Tom. that'd be great.

I feel like a lot of Kurosawa films belong in the canon, but I just think it'd be really cool to face off his two Shakespeare adaptations.