Jump to content
🔒 The Earwolf Forums are closed Read more... ×

The_Triple_Lindy

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    661

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Posts posted by The_Triple_Lindy

  1. Posted

     

    4 hours ago, TopMoose said:

    As a professional musician and survivor of a conservatory education, I have to weigh in on High Strung:

    7. At the final performance, one of the judges turns up her nose at the hip-hop style and another judge counters with "Don't we want to evolve? Don't we want to progress?" This is total bull. The "classical" music world is extremely exclusionary - especially in the halls of higher education - and a conservatory judge would never for a moment consider Ruby's performance artistically valid.

     

    On 12/7/2019 at 1:51 AM, DrGuts1003 said:

    I was surprised the hosts (yup, still calling them hosts) didn’t comment on the conversation the judges have during the middle of Johnny and Ruby’s performance.  The female judge calls it “completely indulgent” and one of the other judges says “I disagree.  Don’t we want to evolve?  Don’t we want to progress?”

    My absolutely favorite part of that exchange is when the main guy announces that the winner was decided "after heated debate."  I can't even imagine what that argument must've been like. I've accompanied lots of dancers, pretty much all of them contemporary dancers, and I love them all, but even at they're most "heated" they still all talk like really respectful yoga instructors disagreeing over what kind of weed they just smoked. They communicate unhappiness, and all emotions, through emphatic abstractions, like "It should be more purple rainbow and less sticky-sticky!" Whereas the ballet instructor probably just called her a fucking moron and stormed off.

    If somehow they did have both classical and contemporary instructors on the faculty, I can't imagine they ever agree about much of anything. Though I'm not classically trained, I've had lots of opportunity to play with classical musicians, and they just seem to have a completely different relationship to music than I do, which is much more "drop the shoulders," if you get me. To them, it seems less about "emotional expression" and more about "fucking nailing it!" Playing those crazy-difficult lines, written 150 years ago by madmen who will never be topped. It's satisfying in a deeply competitive-with-yourself kinda way, where satisfaction comes from conquering your own body and its own stupid limitations. It's intimidating as hell, and I respect it, but those people never drop the shoulders.

    • Like 5

  2. Posted

    Hearing that the director and production team were basing this movie off of a Star Wars novelization makes a lot of sense and explains a lot of its crappiness. So much of what makes this movie exhausting to watch comes down to basic editing. As a visual medium, movies need things like establishing shots and travel montages to move the audience from place to place, whereas novels inherently don't.

    Take, for example, the trial scene, wherein we are standing before the Right Honorable Krang hearing Stella and Akton's hard labor sentence, and then smash-cut to Stella, in the mine, some indeterminate amount of time later, lugging space orbs around on a stretcher with the other slaves. There was no "guards, take her away" moment, no shot of her arriving at the mine, no Shawshank "fresh fish" scene, no nothing. A good movie would show Stella arriving at the prison with other prisoners, an establishing shot of the prison, and then the mine, and then show her working for some length of time before deciding to bust out, but Starcrash just has none of that.

    It was the same thing with the snow planet, when Stella and Elle get back to the ship to learn that Thor had betrayed them -- the movie doesn't even so much as show the damn ship taking off, leaving them abandoned on the planet. Thor walks off screen, and then smash-cut to Stella laying down in the snow to die ... for all the audience knows, the ship is still right there out of frame.

    But novels can get away with that kind of thing because it doesn't need to take the time to present the spectacle of the moment. Smash cuts aren't a problem with novels because you can reveal the shift in time along with all the other details that set the scene. In fact, I think this whole movie might work better as a novel:

    "Stella Star," bellowed Judge Krang,"you are hereby sentenced to a lifetime of hard labor in the galactic acid mines." And with that, court was adjourned.

    ***

    Chapter 5

    Stella's back and shoulders ached as she and the other slaves lifted the acid orb upon the stretcher and joined the queue for the hole full of dry ice. In this cheaply constructed soundstage that was her prison, time seems to slow to crawl. Had she really been wearing this same bikini every day for the last three months? 

    • Like 6

  3. Posted

    5 hours ago, Smigg. said:

    Okay, I'm going to say this now.  Tomorrow's thread for the episode, I'm putting it out there, I might have my magnum opus for jokes I've made on this board, I just cracked myself up, and quite frankly, I found it so funny, I don't care if nobody else does.

    Thanks for letting us know! Now we'll all have the Hopeline on speed-dial, ready to read it over the phone :) 

    • Like 2
    • Haha 3

  4. Posted

    1 hour ago, taylorannephoto said:

    This did not jog my memory at all omg. I do somewhat remember a bifrost bridge joke but I don't think I can take credit for that one 😂

    Okay, I got curious so I looked it up. It was the Freejack episode that I was thinking of:

    On 2/7/2018 at 5:29 PM, The_Triple_Lindy said:

    This week, my DLM Challenge viewing has been dedicated to catching up on the Marvel flicks, and when I got to Thor: The Dark World, I wondered if Rene Russo and Anthony Hopkins considered it a Freejack reunion.

     

    Or perhaps a continuation, wherein McCandless successfully seduced Julie Redlund and lures her into the Spiritual Switchboard so they could rule virtual Asgard as king and queen.

     

    On 2/8/2018 at 9:48 AM, taylorannephoto said:

    So what you're really saying is that the Thor movies are in a Jacob's Ladder situation?

     

     

      Reveal hidden contents

    I'm so sorry y'all I had to do it.

     

     

    On 2/8/2018 at 11:53 AM, The_Triple_Lindy said:

    Jacob's Ladder = Bifrost Bridge

     

    We had this exchange, and then a caller during "Explanation Hopeline" hypothesized that while Anthony Hopkins' brain was dying, his Jacob's Ladder death dream was about how he was Odin, etc.

    This may not have been the one that you were referring to. Meanwhile, I had forgotten what a fucked up movie Freejack was.

    • Like 3
    • Haha 1

  5. Posted

    20 hours ago, taylorannephoto said:

    It did happen to me, but I can't remember what episode it was for anymore. I only remember hearing the phone call and thinking, "That's literally word for word what I commented on the boards..." I came onto the minisode thread and complained a bit (classic taylor) and it seemed like they took notice and quit doing calls for C&Os for a while. Alas, here we are again and the same shit is still happening.

    It was something something "a movie that shared a universe with Thor." Don't remember which movie, but I remember being a part of an exchange jumping off from that post and feeling bad that you got sniped.

    And yeah, it blows to get your stuff plagiarized, and I generally agree with everyone who has said so, but partially, I'm of the mind that everybody here knows that tayloranne made that "bifrost bridge joke" (or whatever it was) first, just like everyone here knows that Vegas820 made the comment about Disneyland ride tickets, like, minutes after the boards were even open for Disclosure, and so on. We all know what's up. The callers can't vouch for each other the way the board-posters can.

    It's easy for me to be glib since it hasn't happened to me, I guess. But while I probably first started coming to the boards out of a desire to get read on the minisode, I'm now just as excited to hear which of y'all's posts get read, because we've been talking about this shit for a week and I've read through the entire board a half-dozen times by the time Friday rolls around. So just know, homies, that if you get poached ...

    source.gif

    • Like 4

  6. Posted

    20 hours ago, RyanSz said:

    For June I can recall these for the love list: Daredevil, Odd Life of Timothy Green, Grease 2, Teen Witch, Drop Dead Fred, Disclosure, Crank 2

    Don't forget ... um, Unforgettable. 

    14 hours ago, GrahamS. said:

    Taking a step back and being less gross, here are a few of my favorite lines that Paul and everyone did not mention:

    Michael Douglas to Demi Moore, after her failed seduction attempt:

    “you take those two champagne bottles in your refrigerator and you go fuck them!”

    Also, There’s the great line Paul and everyone mentioned when Michael Douglas is having his meltdown:

    “Sexual harassment is about power. When did I have the power?”

    But then he follows it up with a line I love even more:

    “Why don’t I be that evil white male you’re all complaining about? Then I can fuck everybody!”

    Then, near the end, Donald Sutherland randomly says to everyone in the office:

    “This merger is the most interesting merger Ive had since my second marriage!”

    My favorite line not to get mentioned was when Sutherland says at the end, "I was so focused on finding the right woman for the job, when I should've been looking for the right person," which is totally a line meant to set up Michael Douglas getting the job, but then he gives it to another woman.

    If I were Rosemary Forsythe, I'd be fucking offended by the implication of that statement. He doesn't think Stephanie Kaplan is attractive enough to warrant thoughts about "women," just "people?" Go right on and do one, Donald Sutherland, you stupid national treasure, you.

    • Like 5

  8. Posted

    14 hours ago, Blast Hardcheese said:

    At the end of the movie, did David move his entire brewing operation up to San Francisco from Los Angeles? It wouldn't be unheard of, but Copper Mountain seems to be in its infancy as a company and moving the whole operation (office, the brewing tanks and hiring a whole new crew--unless his original staff moved up there with him) seems not only cost prohibitive at this stage in the game, but financially irresponsible as well.

    That's funny ... I recognized that they were in a new house and thought it odd that Whitney Cummings just casually came by for breakfast since she didn't live in the same town. I suppose the implication is, indeed, they moved to SF. Which is fine ... if the brewery is off the ground, he doesn't need to be on site, but what is it with this movie and telecommuting? This film seems to either hate or misunderstand just about everything tech-related.

    • Like 4

  9. Posted

    1 hour ago, The_Other_MikeD said:

    What about the husband telling his story of being hit with a poker? Then it would make sense that Rosario was acting in self-defense as she was also attacked. I'm going with reasonable doubt in this case. The worst part was the detective basically saying, "I guess all that other stuff we accused you of earlier was a mistake and certainly can't be seen as more of the same. Sorry. See you at the hospital."

    Because cops love admitting their mistakes 🙄

    I think most prosecutors worth their salt could cast doubt across David's testimony. Oh, this guy who loves the defendant and hates the deceased, who was out cold for most of the time and who could barely spell his name after the fact, said it didn't go down like it totally looks like it went down? One well-prepped brain trauma expert testimony during the cross-examination phase of the trial would mop that right up. 

    • Like 2

  10. Posted

    4 hours ago, DrGuts1003 said:

    We also see Tessa have two margaritas at lunch with Julia.  According to nutritionaction.com “Most restaurant chains’ mojitos, Moscow mules, and margaritas deliver 200 to 300 calories. Chili’s Strawberry or Mango Patrón Margarita hits 360. But a classic margarita—tequila, lime, triple sec—in a small glass cuts most of the sugar and hovers around 200 calories.”

    How many times during an average hen session of probing your exhusband's new girl for sensitive info over top shelf margaritas at Chili's do you think Tessa asks to talk to the manager?

    • Like 4

  11. Posted

    7 minutes ago, PollyDarton said:

    We really should talk about the interrogation scenes. I'm not going to rent it again, but there is line where the cops are like "You expect us to believe... [explains precisely what happens]" and I'm screaming "YES!"

    ALSO- the cop says "Sorry, I had to show him the file" when Julia asks where her fiance went... Is that standard detective work!?

    Any cop in 2017 that hasn't heard of identity theft needs to turn in their badge and gun. Especially the gun.

    But, I'm pretty sure the cops can show David the evidence against Julia. If they thought showing him might convince him to give up some crucial info on her, they'd do it. 

    • Like 6

  12. Posted

    28 minutes ago, Blast Hardcheese said:

    That scene in the police station where the detective is acting all dead-to-rights is absolutely infuriating. It's 2017 and you can trace "Julia's" Facebook account access back to Tessa's IP address? Fuck you, movie!

     

    4 minutes ago, PollyDarton said:

    That's another great moral to take away from this story: Never - EVER - answer calls from blocked, unknown, or phone numbers you don't know. *

    That being said, Julia's technology behavior reminds me a lot of my parent's.  

    Both of these points, plus the "real detective work only happens on printed paper" attitude, make me think this movie was written by boomers who watch too much Dateline.

    • Like 7

  13. Posted

    Despite being a well-documented piece of shit, can we have a moment of empathy for David's likely-diminished quality of life after sustaining a headshot from a fire poker and being unconscious for several minutes? The long-term consequences of a blow to the head followed by prolonged unconsciousness are well documented, and I personally know a handful of people who have received head injuries and have gone on to suffer seizures, narcolepsy, memory damage, and sight or hearing loss. Human beings' soft, squishy bodies don't usually just bounce back from stuff like that. 

    And spare a thought for Julia, who'll likely have to be David's caretaker. David probably won't be allowed to drive, which means Julia will have to haul him back and forth from the brewery and regular CT scans.

    • Like 6

  14. Posted

    4 hours ago, Cameron H. said:

    This movie would have been crazy dark if the movie had ended with the police shooting Julia. From their point of view, after being released for suspicion of murder, this person rushed over to Tessa’s house, murdered her, beat and tied up her husband, and seems to be in the process of burning evidence and kidnapping their daughter. She never speaks to the 911 operator, so for all the police know, Tessa was making the call!

    Honestly, I thought that’s where the movie was going and that Tessa’s final line was almost a fuck you. “I won’t let my daughter remember me as the crazy one. She’ll remember you as the person who killed her mother!”

    Any court in the country would've convicted Julia in a heartbeat. 

    And I laughed out loud when the cops holding Julia said that the evidence against her was all circumstantial. Forget the sexting and panties in the car ... her abusive ex lying dead on her kitchen floor, stabbed by a knife that had Julia's prints all over it? That's "circumstantial?" 

    And then to have the cops walk in to see another person dead by stabbing while Julia's holding the knife? Sorry, Julia ... see you at the parole hearing in 10 years. 

    • Like 6

  15. Posted

    Putting two cents in on this week's bicameral debate, seemingly intended to polarize the boards and divide us ideologically:

    I didn't read Tessa's final act as either a noble sacrifice or a response to her disfigured visage. It was the compulsive action of someone who had a manic crash and acted tragically. 

    She looks at herself in the mirror and says "Why do you always ruin everything?" This seems like a line meant to reflect everything that her mother has told her all her life and that she had internalized over time which, after years of festering as maladaptive behaviors, manifested in the psycho behavior we see in the movie and culminated in one final psychological break and a snap decision to assess her own worthlessness and end her own life. In that regard, she seems like any number of deeply depressed individuals whose outward perfection masks a deep inner pain that she is unable to acknowledge and deal with, in which case, yeah, I might agree with Paul that she's misunderstood.

    On the other hand, the "defeated villain hurls herself to her death" is just the kind of cheap Hollywood trope tripe that this movie seems to be peddling, so ... 

    • Like 6

  16. Posted

    7 hours ago, DrGuts1003 said:

    Also, are we to believe that no one else came across Julia’s Facebook account.  I’m constantly getting asked if I want to be friends with people who I barely have any connection to and yet her fake account seemingly goes unnoticed by everyone else.  Surely Whitney Cummings or another one of her ChapterPad friends had to have gotten a notification that she was now on Facebook.

    Good point. One of the first things I do on Facebook when I get a friend request, even from someone I might know, is look at the number of friends they have. Because guess what an account with one friend means in the world of identity theft and bots? It means LIAR.

    1 hour ago, Cameron H. said:

    In the universe of the movie, Tessa is described by the people around her as being pretty much flawless, but during the margarita confessional scene, she describes Julia as being “gorgeous, talented, and effortlessly beautiful.” I guess she’s not so perfect that she can’t come up with a string of three adjectives where two-thirds of them don’t mean the exact same thing, huh? 

    That being said, I would be pretty impressed if this was intentional flub as a subtle put down of Julia (i.e. refusing to call her intelligent) or as a way of further characterizing her shallow nature. However,  without reaction or comment from anyone in the movie, a line that is essentially saying, “You’re pretty, talented, and pretty” comes off pretty lazy, clumsy, and careless.

    It would make sense, seeing as being pretty is the ultimate objective in Tessa's mind. 

    By the time they have the margaritas, Tessa has already stolen Julia's phone and started reaching out to Mike, so it seems more like a gratuitous complement for the sake of disarming Julia in order to get that sweet, sweet personal info. "You're so pretty and talented ... and did I say pretty? Want to tell me about your beauty regimen, including all your morning activity and the route of your morning jog?" 

    • Like 7

  17. Posted

    12 minutes ago, Cameron H. said:

    I was 100% expecting this - lol. I kept thinking, “Oh my God, why isn’t this ending? This should be over. What’s going to happen now?” Lovey was fine, but I was literally thinking “Friday the 13th” too. 

    It totally should've happened.

    Although, I see Lovey's presence at the end of the movie as an interesting franchise opportunity. I'd love to see a sequel where Lovey is now the one terrorizing Julia, much to everyone else's obliviousness. And maybe the sequel could feature Tessa's aunt hanging around in the background the whole movie, and when Lovey is killed, the aunt could show up at the end, and each sequel goes on that way, with the cousin and the half-sister from dad's second marriage, and so on. Just like the Waterfall Family hippies from Futurama [edit to acknowledge that an audience member said this].

    • Like 4
    • Haha 1

  18. Posted

    The absolute most irresponsible part of this movie is that it perpetuates the dangerous myth that getting gut-stabbed will kill a person instantly. Tessa just falls on the knife and is dead, when in reality, she could've had enough time to lay there and decide she wanted to Inigo Montoya herself up to slay them all. 

    MedicalWelloffKite-size_restricted.gif

    In fact, the movie would've totally redeemed itself if, instead of Lovey at the door at the end, it had been Tessa bursting through the plate glass door with the knife in her hand. Or better yet, dragging them underwater, Jason-style.

    ScholarlyGreenGavial-max-1mb.gif

    • Like 7

  21. Posted

    On 8/16/2019 at 5:28 AM, Baron said:

    I am 99.6% sure that the Voice, the bad guys disembodied voice that we hear throughout the movie, is Ryan Reynolds.  It may not be the same character as he plays in the rest of the movie, but listen to his voice especially in the last scene as he teases the next movie.  

     

    On 8/16/2019 at 9:52 AM, theworstbuddhist said:

    I feel like that would be too easy. My theory is that it's "Mr. Nobody", Kurt Russell's character. Or maybe Adam Scott.

     

    On 8/16/2019 at 1:45 PM, Smigg. said:

    I have a theory as to who "The Voice" is. 

    It's Gina Carano.

    She was Hobb's partner in Fast 6, hence the "Reunion"
    She was Owen Shaw's girlfriend, so she knows Deckard Shaw
    She was supposedly "killed", but, considering this is Fast and Furious, that doesn't mean a fucking thing, she's another "Super Soldier" that Eteon could bring back to life

     

    7 hours ago, austin14 said:

    So my theory is the voice is going to turn out to be John Cena who we know is going to be in Fast and Furious 9, my crazy theory is Hobbs dad is going to turn out to be Nic Cage, and my correction is that there 4 bald people in these movies with Diesel,  the Rock, Statham and  Tyrese Gibson

    Solid theories. I agree that it sounded like Ryan Reynolds at times. And I also agree that Gina Carano is awesome. 

    My guess is that it will be Hobbs' daughter's mama, filling in the "?" in her family tree. Give me Letitia Wright or Taraji P. I'd even take Vivica Fox or Pam Grier. 

     

    • Like 2

  22. Posted

    6 hours ago, theworstbuddhist said:

    Whew, man, poutine is a bigger topic than you might expect. There are some who would argue that the only place to get real poutine is in Quebec, and they are right in the sense that you are more likely to get one made with the best ingredients, ie. proper Belgian style frites topped with squeaky cheese curds (which you can buy as a snack in little bags in every corner store in Quebec) and gravy. And of course there are butthole chefs out there trying to "elevate" the dish by topping it with shaved truffles or some shit and sell it for $20 from a food truck.

    Edited to add: if you go somewhere that advertises poutine and they serve you something that uses like shredded or cubed marble cheese instead of real curds, it is legal in Canada to burn that place to the ground.

    Those of us who live outside of Quebec have some decent chain poutinerie options like Smokes, which has pretty decent traditional style poutine plus a bunch of options for topped versions with assorted meats and so on. Definitely a good post-drinking meal, in fact that is probably the only time you SHOULD eat it.

    Might've been Quebec ... it definitely had the cheese curds. I was on the road with a group, of which one of the members is from Montreal, and her husband, who's from Florida, was getting a real kick out of describing it every chance he got until we finally had to get some.

    I also got to know Tim Horton's pretty well, as well as that falafel place that we always found in the highway rest centers. You Canadians really know how to road trip. 

    6 hours ago, theworstbuddhist said:

    I would certainly eat that, but more likely torn up pieces of baguette or cuban bread. Not a big wheat bread eater.

    I don't ever have baguette in the house. But I'd totally dip that shit ... maybe a vinaigrette, or Tsao's sauce.

  23. Posted

    14 hours ago, joel_rosenbaum said:

    Drunk food is entirely location-dependent.

    Southern California has to be late night taco shops; in San Diego it was -Berto's (there are like 10 places with that suffix). 

    In Seattle it's gotta be Dick's.

    At home it's popcorn.

    Where I live, there are a TON of late night greasy-spoon places, and those that serve a mushroom swiss burger with fries are all tied for my favorite late-night takeout drunk food.

    At home, I think my favorite drunk-snack is to just roll up pieces of bread and dip them in random condiments. 

    10 hours ago, theworstbuddhist said:

    Up here in Halifax (very much a college town) it could be pizza - we have an area called "pizza corner" with various places catering to the local young drinkers - but it could also be a magical food called the donair, which is recognized as the city's official food. Some people confuse this with shawarma or doner kebabs, and they are certainly related, but the classic Halifax donair is shaved spiced beef and/or lamb, some onions and tomatoes, all wrapped in a fresh pita and slathered in donair sauce, which is essentially just condensed milk mixed with sugar and a bit of vinegar. I happen to live perilously close to two of the best donair places in the city and now that I have written so much about it, I know I will be buying one sometime this weekend.

    Here is a CBC video from a few years ago explaining this wonderful, wonderful food. (Before you comment: yes, donair sauce looks like jizz, and yes, our mayor's name is Mike Savage. He's kind of an idiot but at least he cast the correct vote for once in his life.)

    I try hard not to judge Canadian food on sight, or even on description. I tried poutine for the first time two years ago because my friends were raving about it and I was in Ontario. It's fine but it doesn't read well. The smell won me over enough to try it, I think.

    Do you think balls of crumpled up wheat bread dipped in honey mustard or sriracha would play up there? If so, I've got a proposition for you ...

      

    11 hours ago, Cameron H. said:

    (I loved the episode, I love the show, but I’m so fucking glad we can finally stop talking about Drop Dead Fred)

    Congrats to Triple Lindy for the win! đŸŽˆÂ đŸ„łÂ 

    Thanks :) 

    Winning the nothing-prize for the most contentious episode ever with a throw-away comment like that might make one hesitant to celebrate a meaningless victory, but ...

    tenor.gif?itemid=11885968

    Although, assist goes to gigitastic, since it was a reply to their post, so ...

    FoolishOrangeIberianchiffchaff-size_rest

    5 hours ago, grudlian. said:

    I really hate to be "lol millennials" but does anyone actually like Space Jam who wasn't born between (approximately) 1982-1992? It is its generation's Goonies where everyone in a certain age saw it and loved it but it's appeal seems lost on everyone outside of that general age range (unless maybe you really love Looney Tunes or something).

    I like basketball, I love Looney Tunes, and I'm okay with Mike, and I was never compelled to see it. 

    2 hours ago, theworstbuddhist said:

     I was a teen when The Goonies came out and I fucking hate that movie. Never understood what ppl liked about it. *shrug*

    tenor.gif?itemid=10622525

    image.png

    • Like 5

  24. Posted

    12 hours ago, Cameron H. said:

    Has anyone had a chance to look at any of these?

    Actually, yes ... Together Tube and My Circle would work fine for our purposes, provided the movie is available for free or everyone has access to the source. The way it works is very similar to rabbit -- create a room, send out a link, invite others to join, you can chat with each other. The difference is that instead of streaming one room members content, you copy/paste a link into the window and it just plays that linked video for everyone in the room.

    I tried it with my wife using an Amazon Prime video and it worked, but I have no way of knowing if it would work for someone who doesn't also have Prime. I assume the same would be true with HBO, Hulu, etc ... that we'd all have to be members to the site in order to watch a video from it. Don't know if it's true ... I've got time this weekend to try it out with someone, if you want.

    I didn't try Synaptop because it requires an account.

    • Like 1

  25. Posted

    4 hours ago, Rollo Tomasi said:

    Obviously this is at the heart of the disagreement, but I think the more accurate analogy would be if we were discussing a poem that went:

    Rose are red,

    Vomit is blue,

    Sugar is sweet,

    and so are you.

     

    Team Sanity:  What is the vomit line about?  Is this poem supposed to be tender or funny?  If the poet is trying to express affection for the other person, why are they talking about vomit?

    Team Fred:  Sure, the vomit line could be better, but it’s clearly intended to be a love poem.  If you just pretend the vomit line doesn’t exist, it’s a very sweet poem.

    tenor.gif?itemid=12662659

    3 hours ago, Cameron H. said:

    3) I’m not sure I follow your logic on this point.

    Sorry, I should've clarified that this last comment didn't have anything to do with what you wrote. It was snark directed toward a repeated sentiment elsewhere throughout the boards.

    • Like 3
×