Who is your favorite host? Scott or Scott?

[Andrew_Nice_Day 33]

I was just debating this with a friend.

 

On one side, Scott really knows his U2 history and brings a lot of great history of the band to the show. He also has great stories of how U2 has influenced his life. Scott alway knows when to drop in a joke or run with a bit.

 

Scott, on the other hand, provides a variety of interesting U2 trivia. He's great at connecting the evolution of the band to his own life. Scott really drives the comedic voice of the show.

 

So who is your favorite? Scott or Scott?

[Kickpuncher 5012]

Scott, obviously.

[HotSaucerman 2051]

Maybe its just me, but for me? Scott.

[JacobCrites 4977]

I think everyone is missing the point:

Scott

[HotSaucerman 2051]

I think everyone is missing the point:

Scott

Hey.... I'm not gonna say you're right, but you're not wrong.

[mthomassteele 20]

Scott's a real asshole, if you ask me. The way he treats Scott on a weekly basis is just appalling. Scott, on the other hand, sounds like someone you'd love to grab a beer with. A real guy's guy, so to speak.

 

In conclusion, I'd have to say, my favorite host is Scott. What can I say? I'm a sucker for assholes.

[JacobCrites 4977]

I don't know how I could make it any clearer:

Scott.

/thread

[Joe Lerini 7329]

Harris.

 

Wait, I fucked up-!

[allenpwilliams 168]

I think Scott is way better than Scott is.

[freeagent 329]

I think Scott is way better than Scott is.

 

No. You're way off. Scott is definitely better than Scott.

[OwenRobertson 23]

Scott.

[OwenRobertson 23]

Never mind, Paul F. Tompkins seems to know the most the about U2!