Snake 165 Posted April 29, 2017 So.....are we going to talk about this? Can someone go and watch this and then report back? Share this post Link to post
RyanSz 3140 Posted April 30, 2017 I'm amazed that this has gotten the reviews that it had. With the people involved I at least thought that they would try to make a decent film based on an okay book. It's really saying something when the audience Cinemascore. which is usually even still a low B-A for a terribly reviewed film, was a D+. 1 Share this post Link to post
JonathanVik 37 Posted April 30, 2017 From what I understand, it is a confusing mess with no real direction and a tone that goes all over the place. Shame, I was interested in this movie. 1 Share this post Link to post
SlidePocket 707 Posted July 31, 2017 The second adaptation of a Dave Eggers novel starring Tom Hanks to fail pretty badly, the first was last year's "A Hologram for the King". Also the last major roles for Bill Paxton and Glenne Headly, the former of whom died before its release and the latter passed soon after. 1 Share this post Link to post
KelseyKing 2 Posted January 12, 2018 Guys why do they not address corporate espionage with dis bitch live streaming her stuff? Â Answer: because they already own all the other companies? Â WTF did I watch. Share this post Link to post
Handcoversbruise 0 Posted July 4, 2019 Can we talk about ellar Coltrane’s incredibly bad performance? Also when Emma Watson is live-streaming her whole damn life, at no point are there thousand of comments asking her to show her tits. In what world would that not happen?! Share this post Link to post