Jump to content
🔒 The Earwolf Forums are closed Read more... ×
admin

Episode 58 — In The Name of The King

Recommended Posts

Seth Morris aka Bob Ducca joins us as we try to figure out what the hell happened in Uwe Boll’s In The Name of The King: A Dungeon Siege Tale. We talk about how Jason Statham’s character could care less about the death of his son, Matthew Lillard’s use of his ren fair experience, and plastic Burt Reynolds. Jason & June recreate one of the romantic scenes, Seth explains how Ray Liotta has cocaine eyes, and Paul had a tough time finding 5 star Amazon reviews. Jump out of that tree and take a listen!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

God Uwe Boll could have a whole series of episodes dedicated to his work.

Share this post


Link to post

The thing that is totally fucked up about Uwe Boll challenging his critics to a fight is he is a trained boxer, so the critics who have taken him up on his offer get the shit beat out of them.

Share this post


Link to post

My big thing in this one was a very brief moment in the battlefield where about a dozen or so ninjas jump into the scene, stand in a straight line, then proceed to basically do a choreographed dance where they all simultaneously perform the same exact moves, and those moves somehow perfectly correspond to each of their individual fights.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Boomerangs don't return if you hit something with them!

 

Is Uwe Boll 9 years old?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

Quick Question: Do other people enjoy HDTGM episodes more if they have NOT seen the movie they're talking about?

 

I gave this movie a shot because it was free on YouTube, but listening to the podcast, I just got frustrated that they didn't bring up stuff that *I* thought was shitty. I didn't really enjoy this episode, mostly because I think they missed exactly what made this movie SO terrible (lack of drama/stakes) and got sidetracked with peripheral material way too often. And I've felt similarly disappointed when listening to episodes featuring movies I've seen.

 

But when I haven't seen the movie they're discussing, it's fun to try to picture what they're talking about in my head, and because we hear how ludicrous it is, it gets even wilder in my imagination. So I definitely enjoy episodes more when I go in blind.

 

Do you all prefer episodes featuring movies you've seen or movies you haven't seen?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

This wasn't a fun bad movie. Even felt like a waste of a good guest to have to talk about it.

 

And seriously, can someone tell June that it's okay NOT to say a last name if she can't pronounce the name? Just call her Leelee!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

This movie made me violently angry/sad.

 

Great episode though guys, I'll count this as some sort of reward for being really, really bummed out by this shitty movie.

 

Does anyone know why this movie had to be 2 hours long?

Share this post


Link to post

The dungeon romance scene reeanactment was rad. Also this was shot in Canada like 3 hours from Seattle and they used "locals and First Nations peoples" as extras, because Europeans haven't done enough terrible things to Native Americans.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post

the music in this movie was really annoying. It is like they thought: "You know what is so great about those Lord of the rings movies? The score! So let's have music in every fucking scene!"

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post

Somewhere Uwe Boll is busy stealing Jason's idea for a Glory-style movie based on the two black characters.

 

Are they African-Americans or African-mordarans/narnians/gameofthronesplaceans?

Share this post


Link to post

THANK YOU for pointing out how little the movie has to do with the game. I was annoyed by how many reviews seemed to blame the quality of this movie on the fact that it's (supposedly) based on a video game, when it was all due to Boll's insanity.

 

I've played through the first and second game (the third came out after the movie). I'm not defending their honor or anything, because the games honestly aren't that great, but I can tell you that virtually nothing from the games is used in the movie. In fact, the games are generally pretty plot-less and devoid of any characters - it's mostly about killing monsters and getting better loot. What plot there is has no relation to the movie at all and is mostly about gathering powerful magic items to save the world - no king, no succession, no romance, etc.

 

Here are the entirely of the shared elements between the 2 games and the movie:

 

- The kingdom is called Ehb

- You fight the orc-like Krug

- Your character in the first game begins as a farmer

- There are wood nymphs in the 2nd game

- There's an evil wizard in the 2nd game

 

That's IT. I'm pretty sure Uve Boll played the first 5 minutes of each game and then wrote the rest of the plot using generic fantasy tropes.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

This movie was garbage. Matthew Lillard was perhaps the most amazing combination of bad casting and bad acting to ever grace the silver screen.

 

It was a tough movie for the show to talk about, though. It's terrible, but not very enjoyable or unique in any way. It's just really badly made. If more roles had been filled with Matthew Lillard, this would have really been something.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Quick Question: Do other people enjoy HDTGM episodes more if they have NOT seen the movie they're talking about?

 

I gave this movie a shot because it was free on YouTube, but listening to the podcast, I just got frustrated that they didn't bring up stuff that *I* thought was shitty. I didn't really enjoy this episode, mostly because I think they missed exactly what made this movie SO terrible (lack of drama/stakes) and got sidetracked with peripheral material way too often. And I've felt similarly disappointed when listening to episodes featuring movies I've seen.

 

But when I haven't seen the movie they're discussing, it's fun to try to picture what they're talking about in my head, and because we hear how ludicrous it is, it gets even wilder in my imagination. So I definitely enjoy episodes more when I go in blind.

 

Do you all prefer episodes featuring movies you've seen or movies you haven't seen?

 

Yeah, the few times I've watched the movie in advance, I've regretted it, because I'll come to the podcast thinking about all these things that bugged me instead of just enjoying the episode. What's great about the show is the chemistry and the energy between the hosts (and their guest). Watching the movie almost distracts me from that.

Share this post


Link to post

Woah woah woah, Jason is genuinely smiling in the group photo.

 

15x7aza.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

If anyone's wondering why anyone would pony up $60 million for this movie, I'll direct you to an article about the bizarre German tax loophole that funded Uwe Boll's insanity for years. It came out a few years back that because of a weird way that Germany's tax laws are structured, rich Germans can use the funding of movies to get big tax write-offs. When you realize that it's all a scam to help rich Germans dodge taxes, it makes a hell of a lot more sense that Uwe Boll kept getting a lot of money to make movies that kept flopping.

 

http://www.cinemablend.com/features/Uwe-Boll-Money-For-Nothing-209.html

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

If anyone's wondering why anyone would pony up $60 million for this movie, I'll direct you to an article about the bizarre German tax loophole that funded Uwe Boll's insanity for years. It came out a few years back that because of a weird way that Germany's tax laws are structured, rich Germans can use the funding of movies to get big tax write-offs. When you realize that it's all a scam to help rich Germans dodge taxes, it makes a hell of a lot more sense that Uwe Boll kept getting a lot of money to make movies that kept flopping.

 

http://www.cinemable...othing-209.html

this particular shined turd came out two years after that law was changed i think. but he's still able to scrape up about $10m for things like the sequel and the many bloodraynes he has seemed to release so far.

Share this post


Link to post

All of the Romania jokes were super funny, but the movie was actually filmed entirely in Canada.

 

Still makes the Cirque stuff make sense though.

Share this post


Link to post

I have not played the game, nor have I seen the movie, but when Paul mentioned Farmer can grow giant turnips, my mind immediately went, "VIDEO GAME."

Share this post


Link to post

I cant believe youde start with this Boll movie In The name of the King is a Goddamn masterpiece in comparison to Bloodrayne and house of the dead which looks like it was shot in someones backyard from 30 feet away.

 

The weird thing about Bolls career to me is he briefly started making good movies for a little while. after he made some bad but almost good movies like postal and stoic he made Rampage which is a genuinely great movie. Then he made a Darfur movie which was pretty good too.

 

But then he decided to make a movie about Auschwitz and it was really bad. Not funny bad just offensive and lousy bad. He wanted to do a holocaust horror movie which might have worked if he put a lot of effort into it but he just got lazy and cheap so theres just like 20 minutes in the middle of cheaply shot holocaust recreation and its sandwiched between insulting interviews of German kids not knowing shit about the holocaust and footage of hitler smiling at kids?! Boll himself plays a Nazi in it and defended his decision by saying it wasnt like he played hitler. But then in his next movie HE DID PLAY HITLER.

Anywhoo so Yeah after Darfur he went back to sucking. Bloodrayne 3 and Blubberella are unwatchable Garbage. Blubberella is about a fat woman fighting nazis it feels like watching a blooper reel with zero editing. Anyway so it's weird that he managed to write and direct a great movie in Rampage and a few good movies but everything else hes done is such insane crap.

 

House of the dead Id suggest if youre gonna do another of his movies because its soo crazy awful. most of the movie is edited in such a way its like looking at a strobe-light and no continuity like a guy will be stuck in a door but then he gets free but then hes stuck again in the next shot and when they shoot zombies they cut to video game footage like it was place holder footage that they never replaced.

 

im rambling

Share this post


Link to post

×