Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/06/19 in Posts
-
2 pointsCompletely agree, and I'm just as angry this year that he'll be looked over again because his performance in Leave No Trace is fucking STELLAR!
-
2 pointsI saw Sorry to Bother You in the last week of the year and it blew my god damn mind. I was so not expecting it to go in the way that it did and I legit think Boots might be a fucking genius.
-
1 pointI really enjoyed it and it's premise, but it did kinda lose me near the end with Armie Hammer's plan for the work force. Plus I saw it a week or so after re-listening to The Last Dragon episode of the show so Tessa Thompson's art display featuring a monologue from the movie was just oddball enough to work, especially with some of the art exhibits I've seen.
-
1 point
-
1 pointâTwo Rode Togetherâ isnât a great movie, but it is an interesting companion/response to the Searchers. The focus is on the difficulty (and perhaps even the impossibility) of re-integration of captives back into white society, so it may satisfy people who feel Natalie Woodâs return is oversimplified. However, itâs an inherently pessimistic and unsatisfying film, anchored by Jimmy Stewart in one of his oft-overlooked unrepentant asshole roles. I think of it as one of Fordâs late âhalf-wokeâ films (Sergeant Rutledge, Cheynne Autumn) in which he is earnestly trying to take apart myths of the West from the perspectives of Native Americans and minorities, but heâs hamstrung by the conservatism of the studio system and the biases of the time as well as his own. The saddest example of this is how âCheyenne Autumnâ went from Fordâs original conception of a docu-realist narrative starring non-professional native actors to a bloated 60s Hollywood epic half-focused on white soldiers chasing the Cheyenne and half Sal Mineo and Ricardo Montalban in brownface. Anyway, I agree that The Searchers is good but underwhelming, particulary on first watch. Itâs easy to get lost and frustrated in the meandering plot and miss the coherence of the themes and images, or fail to appreciate how easily the film switches from drama into action or suspense (and a little more abruptly in and out of comedy). It helps that since first watching this over a decade ago Iâve seen far more Ford films and become somewhat inoculated to his humor. One of the big problems with lists like the AFI is how they flatten genres and filmographies. Itâs a pity that people write off Westerns or Ford or Wayne because this one overhyped classic doesnât work for them (I did when I first saw this). It also makes films like this and High Noon seem especially unique, when really plenty of Westerns were similarly ambitious and complex. Thereâs as much complexity regarding different versions of masculinity in Stagecoach as there is in the Searchers (though admittedly, not much complexity with the treatment of Natives). Thereâs more darkness in Anthony Mannâs The Naked Spur or Boetticherâs Ride Lonesome. For better Ford, Iâd highly recommend Fort Apache, which fictionalizes Custer and moves the action of Little Big Horn to Arizona, and is a much earlier, and in my opinion far sharper, take down of how Native Americans were mistreated and how the narrative around that was misshapen.
-
1 pointI had an idea similar to yours. Each week, a different guest would interview Paul based on a starter paragraph outlining one of his past misadventures. And this podcast would be called How Did We Get Scheer?
-
1 pointI just listened to the Marc Maron podcast with Topher Grace, and in it Grace talks about how sometimes you do scenes with actors who have their lines fed to them through an earpiece, because they can't be bothered with memorizing. Mario may be busted here!
-
1 pointMy BF and I were bugging about how this was what, a 2-3 day trip max, yet the brother had packed enough clothing for himself and to loan to Mario the entire time, through multiple outfit changes? The mom had set out warm clothes for them to go play hockey in too... like a full hat/coat/gloves+ situation for Mario, who arrived there in a suit with no coat or anything. Not to mention that the brother wore different versions of the same outfit every single scene -- a half zip sweater, usually blue. But somehow he has clothes that fit and are attuned to the personal style of Mario's character? The brother wasn't wearing anything like that luxurious crew neck, form fitted black sweater!! One more thing: The brother was SO weird. No one mentioned him sitting in the dark, alone, drinking beer in the garage? When MJH went to drop the trash she flipped on the light to see him there. Now, granted he was probably upset because she was "engaged" and he was still in the closet but uh, that's not anything we're going to address? And I guess it isn't the kind of thing you'd get into during an ABC Family holiday romcom but then why even add the scene in the first place? It was really odd.
-
1 pointFINALLY a reason (not that we need a reason) to get Nicole Byer and Zukes together! Even if it is only for a horrible holiday film. Give the people what they want! Sizzling hot Mntzoukas / Byer action! June and Lauren star as the quirky best friends maybe? Jessica could be his best friend? Paul plays one of the bad dates. In my mind the dating scene is a speed dating round and we have a sort of montage of the bad dates responding to questions. Mainly because we need more weird childhood tales from Paul and I want to see improvers just be monsters.
-
1 pointAs I've been watching all these terrible mostly-charmless holiday movies, I think we need to move to get Earwolf improvisers in more of these. They'll still be pretty bad movies, but the charm level will certainly improve a million times. Danica and Lacey are just stealing jobs from Wild Horses if you ask me.
-
1 pointI love the part when Slater is opening up about his past and he tells Sabrina that, after his parents died, he grew up in a one bedroom apartment with his grandfather, and then proceeds to tell her, âI learned from an early age that weâre all on our own.â Gee whiz, homeboy certainly doesnât think much of his grandfather, does he?
-
1 pointHey all! New to the boards, so if Iâm posting in the wrong place let me know! At the beginning of the podcast, they talk about where the film is supposed to be set; âNew York, some midwestern US city.â It was actually filmed in my hometown, in Calgary, Alberta Canada. The final scene actually zooms out and shows the entire city. The wood cabin scenes were shot put in Bragg Creek and area, a small hamlet outside of Calgary. Itâs a small detail, but they made no refrence to the actual city it was supposed to take place in, so Iâm just going to say it took place in my hometown, as thatâs where they shot it! Not a big detail, but I couldnât resist giving a shout out to Calgary!
-
1 point
-
1 pointJust a little side note. Right after she kidnaps Mario Lopez and they are in the car talking for the first time, if you look closely, you can see that Mario Lopez is wearing an earpiece in his right ear. It's only in three shots so it can be hard to catch. Idk, but I just found that kinda funny for some reason. Why is he wearing an earpiece at all and how did none of the editors notice that it could be seen in the final cut of the movie?
-
1 pointOne of the more aggravating things in the movie is how the movie tries to portray MJH is this kind of major disappointment to the family, while simultaneously showing her to be the absolute center of her parentsâ universe. It blows my mind just how often the brother and sister are just completely disregarded. For example, on Christmas Day when MJHâs mother is delegating responsibilities to everyone in the house, the brother and sister are tasked with working the kitchen while MJH and Dimps are told to go âhave fun.â Are you kidding me? Youâre telling me I have to stay here and shuck corn on Christmas Day while Clarissa and Slater get to go have kissy-kiss time down by the lake? What kind of bullshit is that? However, I think maybe the most obnoxious example of this is when theyâre decorating the tree. For some reason Bro and Sis are nowhere to be found (probably slinging some salt-slag), and MJHâs mother suggests that Dimps puts the star on the tree. MJH throws a huge tantrum and says how thatâs been her job since she was 4-years-old, but...sheâs the eldest kid, isnât she? Are you telling me that in the ensuing 24 years she never once let her baby brother or sister put the star on the tree? And if it were ever even suggested she would throw a fucking fit? And her parents encouraged this? Man, if I were the brother or the sister I would have peaced out of that bullshit family just as soon as ever I could.
-
1 pointThis is the best possible thing about this movie.
-
1 pointThis was probably my favorite episode of the year! Thank you everyone at HDTGM. At the end of the movie everything seems to be finally working out for MJH. Not only does she have the opportunity to exhibit her art, but she actually manages to sell her piece - thereby validating her life choices. However, in the final moments of the movie, she is surprised to learn that the buyer was none other than Dimps! Obviously, this is meant to be a grand romantic gesture, but really, I feel like discovering Dimps bought her art would be far more damaging to her self-esteem than had she not sold her painting at all. Think about it: for a fleeting moment, this hapless loser gets to feel like the work she does is appreciated and that her passion is validated, only to have it all come crashing down when she learns that the piece wasnât sold because it was necessarily good or well-regraded, but because a loved one bought it for her. Itâs the equivalent of a mother telling you youâre handsome or pretty or a friend telling you your manuscript is great. Of course itâs sweet, but ultimately, because those people are biased, itâs always going to feel like hollow praise. I feel like it would have been far more romantic for him to have anonymously showcased her work and then allowed it to stand on its own. It would have shown his faith in her abilities without coming off as patronizing.
-
1 pointOh my god, the part where Melissa Joan Hart tries heating her food with a hair dryer! YOU ARE 28 YEARS OLD! YOU KNOW THIS WON'T WORK! If she were 10, I'd be okay with it. If she is that stupid, I can understand her family thinking she's a mess even if she has a job loving on her own.
This leaderboard is set to Los Angeles/GMT-08:00
-
Newsletter