Jump to content
šŸ”’ The Earwolf Forums are closed Read more... Ɨ

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/18/20 in all areas

  1. 3 points
    Yes! I thought there was going to be a cut to her waiting for him next year. So when the other military guy showed up I was like, ā€œwait this is still the same year, right?ā€ And if she does start fucking that guy, will Chip still come back next year? Is it some kind of threesome that the woodcarver was setting up?? Is that why the Nutcracker winked at us creepily?? Because once he hooks MJH up with Chip, he immediately leaves to go find a soldier in Germany (also, yes the US had soldiers stationed in Germany stemming from US monitoring after WW2 and then the Cold War era. I knew someone whose husband was stationed there, it was often a midway point to going to Afghanistan or Iraq. Though I remember reading this year that Trump thought they were a waste or something.) And then he sends that soldier to MJH. What is his deal???
  2. 3 points
    I think we have all been looking at this movie backwards. Itā€™s not about a magical sole materializing as a nutcracker in a normal little town. Itā€™s about a normal person whose spirit enters the afterlife and is being pulled between life and death. It is evident that this a not an actual town because: - There is no currency/commerce - The cookies are free, the nutcracker is free, Kate gets a free scarf from the clothing store, Chip wins the silent auction. Money never changes hands. Itā€™s like in Westworld when the robots see something that does not fit in their world, the just say, ā€œThat donā€™t look like nothing to me.ā€ Here Kate just says to the Christmas merchant, ā€œI donā€™t think giving away merchandise is a very sound business practiceā€, yet every merchant in town does it, most evidently, Kate. - It seems to exist in isolation. Although other places are mentioned, we never actually see anything other than this town. I think all the residents are happily ā€œtrappedā€ here in immortality. This is evidenced when Kate takes a stack of packages to the post office with each having only a single name written on a tag. No addresses are given, but Iā€™m sure these packages will be magically delivered the same way goods are magically ā€œpurchasedā€. - The afterlife scenario also explains why Kate is so non-plussed about a man appearing on her floor. I suppose the residents have all magically materialized in similar ways and just become part of the fabric of the hereafter. So the movie is about Chip, a man experiencing a near death experience as his soul enters the afterlife. Apparently Chip is not ready for death and wants to come back to his corporeal state. This is why he keeps saying, ā€œI canā€™t stay here, I need to leave before Christmasā€, etc. In the end I suppose he is resuscitated. We donā€™t see any of that since the story is told from the perspective of the afterlife. Because of this and because the protagonist survives and goes back to real life, this is a Reverse-Jacobā€™s-Ladder-Scenario! As for the soldier/nephew who comes to town at the endā€¦Well, sadly, it seems he is there to stay, so I am sorry to say, he does not survive. This also opens all sorts of questions like, what happened to that single mom and her children in real life? Tragic accident or foul play. The panel wanted to see a movie about that character, letā€™s see that prequel.
  3. 2 points
    I have a lot to say about this one. As I said in the mini thread, I did not enjoy it. Though obviously glad to have Jessica back. I will have to try to organize my thoughts into numbers. But I am bad. 1. It was shot in Mystic, Connecticut. According to the articles I found, it was shot in May. May by the ocean is VERY different than Christmas. It was also shot in, and yes I am spelling this correctly, Olde Mystick Village. Now I grew up in CT and I havenā€™t been to this place since my sisterā€™s bachelorette when we went there to buy fancy cheese. But it is a shopping center. It is supposed to mimic a village. But people donā€™t live there. And I thought, even though I didnā€™t recognize it until mentioned on the podcast, that it was palpable that no one lived there. There was such a sense of emptiness. 1a. There is a Navy submarine base in Groton, CT and also the Coast Guard Academy is near there in New London, CT. I think that Army order was a prank though. Seaports arenā€™t known for their standing armies. 2. It is Dec 11 as I write this. Going to save it to drafts for when the episode thread is up. But I am angry. I purchased this film for $.84 on Vudu and I kind of want my money back. When you have a Christmas movie and have two leads, arenā€™t they supposed to get together at the end? Is that not the tacit agreement we have in Lifetime Christmas movies? I walked away to make some tea (yes, tea, June) and when I came back the Nutcracker was gone and some other guy with weird swoopy hair was there. I did not care for it. 3. I thought this had a chance to be our ā€œMAN-nequin.ā€ They sort of gave Chip a backstory and he couldā€™ve been cursed. Except then Melissa Joan Hart would have to have done something for him, to help him. He kept saying they needed each other. But they didnā€™t. She needed him. She brought nothing to the table. He just fought the Mouse King for her. Also, the Mouse King was a let down. The Mouse King always scared me in the ballet as a kid and this was just two guys in fake mustaches. They were basically Mario and Luigi. I could take them. 4. Like the hosts, I was confused as to why he was German. I went down a rabbit hole on this. I thought he should be Russian because the ballet is Russian. Now it turns out the ballet is based on a story written in 1816 by a Prussian author. So I thought, ā€œah! He shouldā€™ve been Prussian!ā€ But, Chip is said to be the real Nutcracker who inspired the tale because he has ā€œMade in Germanyā€ tattooed on his neck. This contradicts the earlier statement that heā€™s the real Nutcracker from the story since it implies that he was manufactured and isnā€™t a real man at all. Now, things get trickier, the German Republic didnā€™t exist until 1815. Thatā€™s just a year before the story was published and one would thinkā€”if he is the ā€œrealā€ Nutcrackerā€”his real life would have had to have happened BEFORE the story based on it was published. Itā€™s just a really tight timeframe for publishing something even today, and I donā€™t think things were faster in 1815. I also donā€™t think they had MADE IN GERMANY stamped on things in 1816, even if we allow for him to somehow have been ā€œmadeā€ technically in Germany at that time, wouldnā€™t he have to be hand-carved? I think I could go buy that Nutcracker in any Target today. And I donā€™t think itā€™s one that actually cracks nuts either. It looks like the decorative kind. BUT the original story has a character named Drosselmeyer, who is a wood carver and it is his nephew who is turned into THE nutcracker. By naming the old man Drosselmeyer it seems the scriptwriters want to say he is actually from the story. In which case, the way to turn him back human is to promise to love him in spite of his looks (a bushy bearded nutcracker who only turns into a man sometimes). Because the main character swears this and he takes her off to live in his enchanted toy kingdom. Does that mean Melissa Joan Hart couldnā€™t even manage that? And by moving on to the next hot guy in the uniform she has doomed Barry Watson to more years as a fucking nutcracker, sitting on the shelf and waiting for someone to love him? 5. I canā€™t figure out the motivations of Drosselmeyer in the movie. Does he just go around giving enchanted nutcrackers to random women? Because if it is supposed to be his nephew, he up and leaves town before the conclusion which makes me think heā€™s more of a trickster figure. Maybe HE is the Mouse King whose ancestor turned the boy into the nutcracker to begin with, and heā€™s just keeping him trapped. 6. I found some old German-style nutcrackers on wikipedia, apparently they are supposed to keep bad spirits awayā€”who knewā€”and they look a lot cooler than this one. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nussknackermuseum_002.jpg 7. That was definitely a small kitchen. The ā€œbig momentā€ where Chip cracks the nuts was underwhelming for me. I was like, ā€œwell thatā€™s not enough for a thousand cookies.ā€ He had ONE bowl.
  4. 2 points
    No one seemed to be bothered by the magic/his nutcracker-ness in this movie. When MJH tells someone about the nutcracker coming to life, they basically shrug and say ā€˜who cares, heā€™s hotā€™. If my best friend and/or boss said something like that, Iā€™d take them to a doctor.
  5. 2 points
    When the nutcracker left on Christmas Eve, didn't the card say "See you next year"? I swear it did, and at the end of the movie all I kept thinking was how awkward things were going to be....or how amazing for MJH. I need that sequel where he comes back to life and soldier boy is there frosting her cookies and suddenly Barry Watson pulls out his sword. That's an instant holiday classic.
  6. 2 points
    The ex-boyfriend INFURIATED ME! He was so nonchalant in how he broke up with her. I'm not saying he wasn't correct - she had no time for him, I can see why he broke up with her - but what a real d-bag.
  7. 2 points
    Welcome to Arby's. I am the titular Arby.
  8. 2 points
    Can Real Menā„¢ drink tea? Press Haha for Yes, Sad for No, Huh? for Huh?, and Hedgehog for Juuuuuune.
  9. 2 points
    This movie's biggest problem is that it doesn't lean into what it is. It has magical realism, but doesn't seem to care once it's introduced. The should have leaned into Melissa Joan Hart's being alone or a Christmas hater. She didn't hate Christmas; she was busy at work making stuff for Christmas parties. She wasn't some lonely spinster; she was just in a relationship days earlier. The entire movie is maybe two weeks. So, she's dumped, falls in love with Chip, then meets the new guy on Christmas. If anything, she falls in love too quickly. Melissa Joan Hart should have either disliked Christmas or been unable to get over a relationship from years ago. Maybe her last boyfriend dumped her on Christmas Eve or something. That's the entire reason why she dislikes Christmas and is so focused on work. She should actually say, over the nutcracker, "I wish I could find someone to love" as a tear falls onto the doll which is what makes her wish come alive. Chip should also come to life looking more like a nutcracker doll. Big bushy moustache and beard. They should clean him up and reveal he's attractive under all facial hair and uniform. Chip should also be way more intense about his mythical quest (ie - The Fisher King). His zest for life is what sparks Melissa Joan Hart to fall in love. He teaches her to embrace Christmas and ready to love again. I'd argue it's more enjoyable for the audience to see Melissa Joan Hart and Chip get together at the end as well. It's not wildly different from what we have but it acknowledges what this movie actually is instead of downplaying it.
  10. 1 point
    I've listened to it once. It's definitely better than Egypt Station. I don't have any strong thoughts on it other than it's all right. The first song has a weird sound for Paul. It sounds like some riff I would have come up with in college. Paul's voice on Women And Wives is a choice. Deep Deep Feeling doesn't need to be 8 minutes long. That's about it.
  11. 1 point
    Also, obsessed with the mouse king and dressed like a nutcracker. This should have just been Mannequin but takes place at Christmas. I'd even settle for Mannequin On The Move at Christmas.
  12. 1 point
    Hereā€™s what bugged me about army guy at the end: heā€™s not an adequate substitute for her just continuing her relationship with Chip. Heā€™s not filling any discernible void. Based on what we know about MJH and her workaholic tendencies, the kind of casual, once-a-year relationship that she would have had with Chip seems almost ideal. Yet, by pairing her off with the army dude, the movie seems to be positing that that kind of limited relationship would be inadequate, and that she requires a more present partner. Which is fine, of course. However, the movie then decides to pair her off with a person who is not only less magical than Chip, but equally (if not more) unavailable! The movie goes to great lengths to tell us how rare it is for army dude visit his aunt. From the sound of it, it seems like itā€™s been years. If anything, a guaranteed once-year-visit from Chip sounds far more stable and reliable than whatever she can build with some random army guy who never has time to visit.
  13. 1 point
    Verily, verily, I say unto you: All aboard the choo-choo train!!!
  14. 1 point
    Did anyone else notice how many times she changed her pants? She would leave her house in jeans and a sweater, then get to the bakery and change into weird yoga pants. Then she would change into different pants to sit on her couch and work on spreadsheets. 3 pants a day? She might be able to save some money in laundry soap and her water bill if she just wore the yoga pants from the get go.
  15. 1 point
    Hi! Its been a while! But I can't resist a bad Christmas movie
  16. 1 point
  17. 1 point
    i cannot believe the gang didnt comment on the "movers with a union moving van", remember they are wearing fake handlebar mustaches and one guy is eating string cheese non stop..
  18. 1 point
    In the beginning of the movie did MJH's boyfriend just straight up admit to cheating on her and blaming it on her being a busy, successful baker? And no one seemed really upset about that? It bothered me through out the whole movie that she was more upset about being single for the ball instead of just pissed he was apparently cheating on her the whole time. My main take away from this movie are these two images I immediately sent to my friends while I was watching this movie. Barry Watson is great at being a terrible actor. He has another made-for-tv movie where he's a robot and its god awful and --- he's the best part of it.
  19. 1 point
    ā€œLife can be tough, and your mental health is so very important. With this service, you can speak with a licensed and trained therapist at any time. Just use the offer code: BONKERS...ā€
  20. 1 point
    I just started listening to McCartney III. Already I think I like it more than Egypt Station. Feels more raw and experimental ā€” it feels kind of like McCartney I but with better production values.
  21. 1 point
    I watched a little bit of The Dictator and can confirm Jason is still in it.
  22. 1 point
    How fucking dare you make me choose between Robocop, Reba, and AC Slater. The obvious answer for best choice is Robocop's body, Reba's voice, and Mario's Jheri curl mullet.
  23. 1 point
  24. 1 point
  25. 1 point
    I haven't watched the new cut, but I remember thinking the same about Part III. A lot of folks said it was terrible, but I thought it was just that: decent. Sofia isn't good in it, George Hamilton is a poor replacement for Robert Duvall, and some of the plot is hard to follow. On the other hand, Andy Garcia is pretty great, the direction of Talia Shire's character is interesting, and the end of Michael's story works well. So yeah, a mixed bag but I never thought it was a bad movie. It's just nowhere near as good as the originals.
This leaderboard is set to Los Angeles/GMT-07:00
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?

    Sign Up
×